If you are a parent with a child in the B.C. public school system, the recently released report by a labour mediator on the bargaining situation for teachers and their employers makes for very bleak reading.
The 60-page report by B.C. Labour Board mediator David Schaub is a concise analysis of the inherent problems in that bargaining process and as such, provides scant hope that any new contract can be negotiated without major intervention by a third party (most likely the provincial government).
His recommended terms for settling the contract were swiftly rejected by the teachers’ union, so that part of the report is DOA for now (although I would not be surprised if they form the basis of any contract that may be imposed). However, the rest of the report is illuminating.
Schaub charts the troubled history of contract talks between the B.C. Teachers Federation and the provincial government agency that represents school board employers of teachers.
In doing so, however, he provided two clues that may explain why the teachers’ union has had so much trouble negotiating a successful contract pretty well every round of talks (since 1987 only one contract has been negotiated without third-party intervention or imposition from the provincial government).
While he says he won’t lay blame on who is most responsible for the ongoing paralysis, those two clues point clearly at the BCTF when it comes to who is most responsible.
First, he made it clear the two sides in every dispute cannot even agree on the bargaining structure. Schaub said this is a “significant” point with the BCTF attempting to refer issues to the local bargaining tables and BCPSEA (the employer agency) attempting to seek standardization of issues at the provincial table.
In other words, the BCTF is still fighting the decision by the NDP government of the 1990s to end almost all local bargaining and to push pretty well all items for negotiation at the provincial table. The reason this was done was that prior to that switch, BCTF locals were “whipsawing” school districts by forcing them to agree to contracts they could not fund.
Therefore, it appears the BCTF has continually refused to accept the full decision made by the NDP government in 1994 to change the structure of collective bargaining, to make it provincewide rather than locally focused. If it thought the current NDP government was interested in revisiting that decision, the union must be seriously disappointed.
This position has essentially hamstrung the pace of negotiations. In the 58 days of bargaining and the 18 days of mediation in this contract round, just three agenda items were resolved. That is both astonishing and ridiculous.
The second problem appears to be his suggestion that the BCTF thinks the entire K-12 education as set out by the government of the day should somehow be on the bargaining table. Schaub calls this a “major source of tension” and he appears to chide the union on this point.
“The focus of the K-12 parties should be on the success of the system and the standard of living of those employed in it,” he wrote, and then noted the government has to balance those considerations with much larger ones, such as the funding of health care, social services and transportation.
In other words, he appears to say it is not appropriate to put the government’s education budget on the table, as if it can be changed somehow through negotiations. That is not how budgeting works: the finance minister tables the budget and the legislature votes on it (not a union and its employer).
So Schaub has put his finger on two critical issues that, unfortunately, do not seem to be about to change for the better any time soon.
After weighing the entire situation, the mediator came to one major conclusion and it is not likely to make parents very happy.
“It is evident there is a disconnect between the parties that will not allow them to reach a collective agreement,” he wrote.
Which means either a strike or government intervention – or both – are out there on the horizon.
Keith Baldrey is chief political reporter for Global BC. [email protected]
What are your thoughts? Send us a letter via email by clicking here or post a comment below.
